September 12, 2018 by: Ethan Huff
News) A recently uncovered chain of emails sent back and forth between
executives at Google the day after the 2016 presidential election prove,
without a shadow of a doubt, that the search engine giant willfully
meddled with the election in an attempt to throw it in favor of failed
Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton.
a nutshell, Eliana Murillo, a Hispanic woman who heads Google’s
“Multicultural Marketing” department, was caught conversing with other
Google employees about how to get more Latino people out to the polls in
an attempt to help Clinton win the election. Murillo also used the term
“silent donation” to indicate that her employer had given cash
contributions to pro-Hillary causes.
a primary email sent on November 9, 2016, that contained the subject line
“Election results and the Latino vote,” Murillo claimed that her efforts
were “non-partisan,” only to later reveal that she was actively working
alongside other Google influencers to boost Latino voter turnout, which
she believed would work against Donald Trump.
was a major miscalculation, Murillo later admitted in another email in the
chain, revealing that Latino voters actually preferred Trump at margins
far higher than they did for other Republican candidates in previous
elections. As many of our readers already know, Trump garnered nearly 30
percent support among Hispanics on average, which is far and above what
any of the “experts” were predicting.
worked very hard,” Murillo stated openly in one of her emails. “Many
people did. We pushed to [sic] get out the Latino vote with our features,
our partners, and our voices.”
should be a federal investigation into election collusion by Big Tech,
suggests Tucker Carlson
email chain was first obtained by Tucker Carlson from Fox News, who
was quick to point out the irony of Democrats and leftists whining and
crying about made-up Russian collusion when we now have real evidence
showing that it was the anti-Trumpers who were colluding and meddling to
try to steal the election.
alone could determine the outcome of almost any election just by altering
its search selections and we would never know it,” Carlson explained
during a recent segment of his show.
statement by Carlson reflects research conducted by Dr. Robert Epstein, a
social scientist and expert in all things Google, who published several
very detailed reports explaining how Google maintains unthinkable control
over the election process. One of these reports showed that Google search
manipulation has the potential to swing a large percentage of voters,
which remains a credible concern as we approach the upcoming midterm
wasn’t a get-out-the-vote effort or whatever they say,” Carlson added
during the segment.
wasn’t aimed at all potential voters. It wasn’t even aimed at a balanced
cross-section of subgroups. Google didn’t try to get out the vote among,
say, Christian Arabs in Michigan or, say, Persian Jews in Los Angeles –
they sometimes vote Republican. It was aimed only at one group, a group
that Google cynically assumed would vote exclusively for the Democratic
Google hasn’t even tried to deny that its employees were engaged in a
conspiracy to thwart the democratic process, it’s obvious that the tech
giant simply doesn’t care to even pretend to be neutral or “not evil,” as
its former company motto suggested. And should we really be surprised,
seeing as how Google and many other tech giants have decided that open
censorship is now a-okay?
mobilization effort targeted not only the entire country but swing states
vital to the Hillary campaign,” Carlson added. “This was not an exercise
in civics; this was political consulting. It was in effect an in-kind
contribution to the Hillary Clinton campaign.”
for this article include: