Wednesday, December 20, 2017
= culturally induced ignorance by the publication of inaccurate or
misleading scientific data.
is it that the HPV vaccines are presenting so many deadly and
life-altering adverse reactions? This may just be the most dangerous case
of agnotology in vaccines ever.
of the 16 HPV vaccine trials, only 2 used the medical industry standard of
an inert saline placebo. Of these trials, 10 out of 16 compared the HPV
vaccine against an aluminum adjuvant, and 4 of those trials used an
aluminum-containing vaccine as the placebo. I think that violates EVERY
scientific standard protocol.
the optimistic assumption that HPV vaccination (even if proven effective
against cervical cancer as claimed), will result in 70% reduction of
cervical cancers appears to be largely based on premature, exaggerated and
invalid surrogate marker-based extrapolations”
Australian Arm of the HPV Vaccine Scandal
The Australian HPV vaccine scandal was created when the approval process
for the Gardasil vaccine was interfered with. In 2006 the Australian
National Immunisation Program Schedule run by the Pharmaceutical Benefits
Advisory Committee (PBAC) rejected the Gardasil application. ”PBAC has
advised that there was a lack of information in CSL’s application on how
long the vaccine remains effective, whether a booster would be needed and
if so, how to determine the right target group for the follow-up. The PBAC
said it was also not provided with enough information on the long-term
effects of the vaccine on the incidence of cervical cancer.” The PBAC also
found that it is not cost effective for taxpayers at this time to fund
GARDASIL® on the National Immunisation Program at the price proposed by
24 hours that decision that was overturned by the sitting Prime Minister
John Howard. This was in the lead up to the 2007 federal election. I
wonder how the duration of effect and unfavourable cost-effectiveness
changed in a 24 hour period?
July 2012 the Labor Federal Health Minister Tanya Plibersek oversaw the
roll-out of Gardasil vaccination for boys with open public support from
Ian Frazer. In his official message of support for the funding of the
national HPV vaccine program for boys, Ian Frazer failed to declare his
conflict of interest that he receives royalties from the sale of HPV
vaccines. It looked a lot like free advertising by the government for
Professor Frazer’s financial interests.
of the problems with the HPV vaccines are as follows; lack of quality
research, efficacy, it kills and maims, they are full of neurotoxins
(aluminum is the biggest problem), the cervical cancer that the vaccine is
supposed to protect against is extremely rare, the HPV virus clears up on
it’s own in most cases and you never know you’ve had it, let alone
contract cervical cancer from it. Let’s explore these issues a little
lack of quality research to aluminum placebos to outright
misrepresentation of data and being fast-tracked for public use, the HPV
vaccines stand out as the prime example of agnotology in vaccines.
by one, the stories of young girls (and now boys) being killed and/or
maimed for life are coming to light. Young people, fit and healthy, in the
prime of their lives, suddenly can’t do anything. Can’t play sports, can’t
go out with their friends, can’t learn to drive, can’t even walk in a lot
of cases. All after the HPV vaccines. Nothing else changed, except they
were injected with a toxic cocktail of chemicals that didn’t save them
from any disease. The vaccines are ruining many lives.
the ‘fast track’ rules for licensing vaccines in America, only 6 months of
trials are required for licensure of a product. Of course, the HPV
vaccines got that ‘fast track’ approval.
is a 10% chance of hospitalisation after a HPV vaccine. In Canada, in 2016
there was a study undertaken, with information taken from 3 databases.
There were 195,270 females that received 528,913 doses of HPV vaccine
resulting in 19,351 hospital emergency department visits within 42 days of
the clinical trials, 185 participants reported a serious adverse event,
this representing 2.5% of the population of the study.
trials of the vaccines were done on children aged 15 and above, despite
them currently being marketed for 9-year-olds.
new HPV vaccine doubles the antigens and aluminum of the last HPV vaccine.
to the American FDA 2.4 women per 100,000 die of cervical cancer in the US
each year. And yet the FDA says that 2.3 per 100 girls and women developed
an “incident condition potentially indicative of a systemic autoimmune
disorder” after enrolling in the Gardasil clinical trial. Did you read
that right? Yes, in the Gardasil trial 2.3% of people in that trial
developed an autoimmune disorder. Those numbers seem back to front. How
can it be that a vaccine gives a better chance, by far, of being injured
than the disease it’s supposed to prevent? That’s illogical not to mention
immoral, seeing as these young people are getting killed and maimed. The
2.4 women per 100,000 that die of cervical cancer = 0.0024% Compare that
to the 2.3% of people that got an autoimmune disorder from the Gardasil
trials and the numbers just don’t make sense.
is just one more example of agnotology in vaccines – culturally induced
ignorance by the publications of inaccurate or misleading scientific data.